Over on [Midnight Pub](https://midnight.pub), someone left a nice comment on someone else’s post, and it said that they were glad they found text-based websites, as it was less “spectacle-driven”, and I agree 100% with that comment.nnWhen I was using social media, nearly everything posted had some sort of photo, or illustration, or GIF, or video attached to it. A lot of the time, people didn’t just *say* what they wanted to say. And before that (before I started using social media in 2009) every blog post I saw, and every blog post I wrote, *had* to have some sort of photo included with it. Be it a generic header photo, or a photo (or series of photos) related to a specific thing, or whatever the case, it *had* to have that included within the post body somewhere, because I thought that that was “what made a blog post a blog post”.nnAnd around 2014 when I started writing (on Tumblr) on a daily basis, and I just wanted to chronicle elements of my life, I imagined some type of blog of *just* text-based entries. Like a pastebin of my life. And I had seen such blogs/journals like that before, but it had been years (since the late-1990’s) that I saw a text dominant, photo-free website or blog of *any* kind.nnAnd yes, photos *are* nice, and I have [a spot for that, too](https://snap.as/tmo), but mostly I just want to hammer text about what is on my mind on any given day.nnIn fact, most blogs I *read* these days are primarily text-based. I have zero qualms with someone including a few (or even many) photos in a post, but when the entry requires me to scroll past *this* GIF, or has an embedded video for me to to watch in order to understand the remainder of the entry, I just click away and do not read that entry.nnSo, with what was said on M.p, I agree – a “non-spectacle” Internet is a better (and faster, and more efficient) way of doing things. Usually.nnback latern

Subscribe to from the desk of TMO

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.